Re: continuing daily testing of dbt2 against postgresql
От | Mark Wong |
---|---|
Тема | Re: continuing daily testing of dbt2 against postgresql |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 452BCCE5.70900@osdl.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: continuing daily testing of dbt2 against ("Luke Lonergan" <LLonergan@greenplum.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: continuing daily testing of dbt2 against
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Luke Lonergan wrote: > +1 > > Mark, can you quantify the impact of not running with IRQ balancing enabled? Whoops, look like performance was due more to enabling the --enable-thread-safe flag. IRQ balancing on : 7086.75http://dbt.osdl.org/dbt/dbt2dev/results/dev4-015/158/ IRQ balancing off: 7057.90http://dbt.osdl.org/dbt/dbt2dev/results/dev4-015/163/ The interrupt charts look completely different. There's too much stuff on the chart to determine what interrupts are from what though. :( It needs to be redone per processor (as opposed to per interrupt per processor) to be more useful in determining if one processor is overloaded due to interrupts. http://dbt.osdl.org/dbt/dbt2dev/results/dev4-015/158/report/sar/sar-intr.png http://dbt.osdl.org/dbt/dbt2dev/results/dev4-015/163/report/sar/sar-intr.png But the sum of all the interrupts handled are close between tests so it seems clear no single processor was overloaded: http://dbt.osdl.org/dbt/dbt2dev/results/dev4-015/158/report/sar/sar-intr_s.png http://dbt.osdl.org/dbt/dbt2dev/results/dev4-015/163/report/sar/sar-intr_s.png Mark
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: