Re: [HACKERS] DOC: catalog.sgml
От | Zdenek Kotala |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] DOC: catalog.sgml |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4523F5FC.6010407@sun.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] DOC: catalog.sgml (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote: > Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM> writes: >> There is new version of catalogs overview patch. This version add only >> one column into overview table which contains Oid/Filename for each >> catalog table. Oid information is important if someone need make >> relation with filename on disk and related catalog table. > > I still say this is just confusing clutter. The proposed patch even > goes so far as to give the OID pride of place as the most important > item you could possibly want to know about a catalog, which is surely > silly. You have right that OID is not important information in many cases, but how I said It is useful when you want know relation between filename and catalog table. > People who actually want to know this information can look into the > pg_class catalog, which has the advantages of being complete (eg, it > covers indexes too), guaranteed up-to-date, and easily program-readable. > I really do not see the value of putting it in the sgml docs. You can look into pg_class catalog only if database is running. If you have some data corruption problem, OID should help during recovery. But you have right, that pg_class have complex information and who want to "play" with datafiles, he must know more than OID. OK, thanks for response, forget to this patch Zdenek
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: