Re: workaround for buggy strtod is not necessary
От | Zdenek Kotala |
---|---|
Тема | Re: workaround for buggy strtod is not necessary |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 45237BEF.6000302@sun.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: workaround for buggy strtod is not necessary (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: workaround for buggy strtod is not necessary
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Zdenek Kotala wrote: >> Solaris had broken strtod function when parse "Inf" and "Nan". See >> solaris.h. This bug has been fixed for all current versions of Solaris ( >> 8, 9, 10). See >> >> http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-21-108993-62-1&searchclause=108993-62 >> http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-21-112874-34-1&searchclause=112874-34 >> >> >> Workaround is not necessary now, but I'm not sure if workaround removing >> is good idea. There are some possible variants: >> >> >> 1) keep workaround in the code for compatibility with unpatched system >> and adjust comment in solaris.h >> >> 2) remove workaround and mention required Solaris patch in the >> Solaris.FAQ document >> >> 3) add some test into configure script and use workaround only on >> unpatched system. (It should be nightmare for packagers) > > #1. What do you want to change about the existing comment? > > /* > * Many versions of Solaris have broken strtod() --- see bug #4751182. > * For the moment we just assume they all do; it's probably not worth > * the trouble to add a configure test for this. > */ > /* Many versions of Solaris had broken strtod() -- see bug #4751182. Now, it is fixed in recent versions of Solaris (8 and above -- see patch 108993-62 and 112874-34). However, there should be many unpatched system. For the moment we just assume they all do; it's probably not worth the trouble to add a configure test for this. */ It is only update that it is fixed and why workaround is not removed. Zdenek
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: