Re: libedit broke in head
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: libedit broke in head |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 452044D3.9050205@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: libedit broke in head (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes: >> I really don't get the libedit-preferred syntax? Why not just: > >> --with-libedit use BSD Libedit not GNU Readline >> --with-readline use GNU Readline not BSD Libedit >> --without-readline do not use GNU Readline nor BSD Libedit > > Well, the point is that the current configure behavior usually does the > right thing *without* any switches. If we made it behave as above then > the user would be forced to specify which library was installed on his > system, which is a bit pedantic when most platforms will have only one. Well hmmm. The only thing I can say to this, would be if you are compiling from source, being pedantic is usually a good thing ;). I do see your point however. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend > -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutionssince 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: