Re: continued segmentation fault
От | Geoffrey |
---|---|
Тема | Re: continued segmentation fault |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 451C3D2E.3020705@3times25.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: continued segmentation fault (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: > On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 02:57:09PM -0400, Geoffrey wrote: >> We continue to have segmentation faults of the /usr/bin/postgres process >> as I mentioned in an earlier thread. In all cases, the core file >> always indicates a segmentation fault, but the backtraces don't seem to >> consistently point to any particular problem. Then again, when you go >> stomping around in memory where you don't belong, all bets are probably off. > > 99% of the time random segmentation faults are memory trouble. Have you > tried memtest86 on the machine in question? No, but that's a thought. We actually have two machines that are clustered and we see the problem on both. Once is carrying a heavier load, thus it happens there more often. -- Until later, Geoffrey Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. - Benjamin Franklin
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: