Re: Insert/select union bug
От | Peter |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Insert/select union bug |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 451A4D04.5040403@greatnowhere.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Insert/select union bug (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Insert/select union bug
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
UNION ALL would probably be quicker still, you're right.
Typecast eliminates the issue, you're right on that as well. However, my problem is that those statements are dynamically generated on various tables/columns, so typecasting would mean extracting target field type and translating fieldtype code into SQL typename. Rather messy.
Peter
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 12:14:44PM +0300, Peter wrote:create table temp(a timestamptz); insert into temp(a) select NULL; /* this passes */ insert into temp(a) select NULL union select NULL; /* fails: ERROR: column "a" is of type timestamp with time zone but expression is of type text */Perhaps you could indicate in the subselects the type? For example: insert into temp(a) select NULL::timestamptz union select NULL; I think as long as the first has the right type, you're set. BTW, UNION ALL is probably more efficient. Have a nice day,
UNION ALL would probably be quicker still, you're right.
Typecast eliminates the issue, you're right on that as well. However, my problem is that those statements are dynamically generated on various tables/columns, so typecasting would mean extracting target field type and translating fieldtype code into SQL typename. Rather messy.
Peter
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: