Re: Block B-Tree concept
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Block B-Tree concept |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 451A34E6.8020705@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Block B-Tree concept ("Jim C. Nasby" <jim@nasby.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Block B-Tree concept
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Jim C. Nasby wrote: > Couldn't vacuum just eliminate tuples marked dead? Heck, don't we do > that anyway right now? You mean _index_ tuples marked dead? Sure, no problem there. > Granted, you'd want to periodically ensure that you scan the entire > index, but that shouldn't be horribly hard to set up. Well, it seems to be. A vacuum can't evaluate index expressions because it's not in a real transaction. The DBA could set up a cron job to do "SELECT * FROM foo WHERE bar > 0" etc. with enable_seqscan=false? That would work, but we can't depend on an additional administrative task like. And we might as well just disable the optimization that's causing us problems. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: