On 02.09.21 10:15, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 31.08.21 22:43, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I find variant 1 a bit cleaner, and safer. I'd rather default to
>> assuming that RECORD doesn't hash, when we don't have enough info
>> to be sure.
>
> Ok, here is a more polished patch for that.
committed