Re: horo(r)logy test fail on solaris (again and solved)
| От | Josh Berkus |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: horo(r)logy test fail on solaris (again and solved) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 45195DFC.3030907@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: horo(r)logy test fail on solaris (again and solved) (Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM>) |
| Ответы |
Re: horo(r)logy test fail on solaris (again and solved)
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Zdenek, >> Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM> writes: >>> But the question is if the "-fast" flag is good for postgres. The >>> -fast flag sets "brutal" floating point optimization and some >>> operation should have less precision. Is possible verify that >>> floating point operation works well? >> >> That's a pretty good way to guarantee that you'll break the datetime >> code. >> >> It might be acceptable if you use --enable-integer-datetimes. > > I suggest to remove mention about -fast flag from FAQ.Solaris or add > warning about usage of this. > > Josh do you have any cc flags suggestion? Using Sun Studio? I'm hardly the expert. Maybe Jignesh? --Josh Berkus
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: