Re: ReadBuffer(P_NEW) versus valid buffers
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ReadBuffer(P_NEW) versus valid buffers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4515F8D8.9090005@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ReadBuffer(P_NEW) versus valid buffers (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: ReadBuffer(P_NEW) versus valid buffers
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz> writes: >> The check looks good - are we chasing up the Linux kernel (or Suse) guys >> to get the bug investigated? > > I asked around inside Red Hat but haven't gotten any responses yet ... > seeing that it's a rather old Suse kernel, I can understand that RH's > kernel hackers might not be too excited about investigating. (Alan Cox, > for one, has got other things to worry about this weekend: > http://zeniv.linux.org.uk/%7etelsa/boom/ Uhmm... doh? Joshua D. Drake > > I believe Dan's busy updating his kernel --- if a current Suse kernel > still shows the problem then he should definitely file a bug with them. > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: