Re: After how many updates should a vacuum be performed?
От | Ellen Cyran |
---|---|
Тема | Re: After how many updates should a vacuum be performed? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4509566A.20303@urban.csuohio.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: After how many updates should a vacuum be performed? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: After how many updates should a vacuum be performed?
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
The FSM seems to be large enough. The verbose indicated 39 relations, 5090 pages, and 3952 total pages needed. Allocated FSM size is 1000 relations & 20000 pages = 186KB shared memory. Also, the vacuum of all the database only took 1 hour and 20 minutes so is there anything I should look at the next time this happens besides i/o? Thanks. Ellen Tom Lane wrote: > Ellen Cyran <ellen@urban.csuohio.edu> writes: > >>>Hm, that should be OK. What do you have maintenance_work_mem set to? > > >>It's set at the default 16384. > > > That should be plenty for getting rid of a million or so tuples. I'm > wondering if you are seeing some weird locking effect. Is the VACUUM > constantly busy with I/O or does it sit and wait at points? Do you have > other queries actively accessing the table during the VACUUM? > > regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: