Re: Aggregates with internal state type?
От | Markus Schaber |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Aggregates with internal state type? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 450875FC.9040907@logix-tt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Aggregates with internal state type? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Aggregates with internal state type?
Re: Aggregates with internal state type? |
Список | pgsql-sql |
Hi, Tom, Tom Lane wrote: > Markus Schaber <schabi@logix-tt.com> writes: >> This lead me to the question whether it is possible to use "internal" as >> state type for an Aggregate whose functions are implemented in C. > > No, because the system has no idea what the representation of an > "internal" state value might be, and in particular how to copy it. > The same goes for other pseudotypes. Ah, I see. So there's no possibility to pass some void* kind of intermediate data, I have to craft at least a dummy PostgreSQL datatype for it. This also solves the question how such things would be cleaned up in case of an intermediate error. Thanks, Markus -- Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG Dipl. Inf. | Software Development GIS Fight against software patents in EU! www.ffii.org www.nosoftwarepatents.org
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: