Re: Application name patch - v4
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Application name patch - v4 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4508.1259691922@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Application name patch - v4 (Marko Kreen <markokr@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Application name patch - v4
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Marko Kreen <markokr@gmail.com> writes:
> If the pooler gets new connection with same username:database
> as some existing connection, but with different appname,
> what it is supposed to do?
Whatever it wants to. People seem to be imagining that the appname
isn't under the control of the pooler. It's a connection property,
remember? It won't be set at all unless the pooler explicitly sets it
or allows it to be set.
I would imagine that typically a pooler would consider the whole
connection string as defining connection properties and so appname would
work the same as username or anything else, ie, you get shunted into
a different connection pool if you ask for a different appname.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: