Re: remove more archiving overhead

On 7/7/22 21:56, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> At Thu, 7 Jul 2022 15:07:16 -0700, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote in
>> Here's an updated patch.
> 
> Thinking RFC'ish, the meaning of "may" and "must" is significant in
> this description.  On the other hand it uses both "may" and "can" but
> I thinkthat their difference is not significant or "can" there is
> somewhat confusing.  I think the "can" should be "may" here.

+1.

> And since "must" is emphasized, doesn't "may" also needs emphasis?

I think emphasis only on must is fine.

Nathan, I don't see the language about being sure to persist to storage 
here?

Regards,
-David