Re: Porting from ORACLE to PostgSQL

Ron Johnson wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Eliminating 21 line .signatures would be nice, too.

How about your 16 lines ;)

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


>
> codeWarrior wrote:
>> Perhaps you should look at EnterpriseDB -- It's an Oracle-compliant wrapper
>> for postgreSQL....
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "gustavo halperin" <ggh.develop@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:44FCA0A7.5080100@gmail.com...
>>> Hello
>>>
>>> I need to porting many old ORACLE-oriented-SQL files and I have many
>>> problem with this code. Sometimes the code use some types not supported in
>>> PosgSQL like "number" or "varchar2", there fore, can I write some type of
>>> declaration (like in c : #define alias_name name) in order to make PosgSQL
>>> recognize these types? Or there are other solution that you recommend to
>>> use ?
>>>
>>>   Thank you, Gustavo
>
> - --
> Ron Johnson, Jr.
> Jefferson LA  USA
>
> Is "common sense" really valid?
> For example, it is "common sense" to white-power racists that
> whites are superior to blacks, and that those with brown skins
> are mud people.
> However, that "common sense" is obviously wrong.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFE/aQWS9HxQb37XmcRArJVAKCNjKPIGC0dZKCZNgZBTz9wdYl7nQCfYZFU
> etqDdW8rRm+gXShS1iF3Nq8=
> =g+pL
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
>


--

    === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
    Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
              http://www.commandprompt.com/