Re: Ding-dong, contrib is dead ...
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Ding-dong, contrib is dead ... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 44FD9607.80809@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Ding-dong, contrib is dead ... (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Ding-dong, contrib is dead ...
Re: Ding-dong, contrib is dead ... |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew - Supernews <andrew+nonews@supernews.com> writes: > >> Userlock needs to go into core, not get removed; this was discussed in a >> previous "let's clean up contrib/" thread. >> > > Something like it ought to go into core, but personally I'd opt for > taking the opportunity to redesign the API, which was a bit crufty to > begin with. That would eliminate all question of whether the clean room > was clean enough. > > > It seems odd to remove the module from contrib for 8.2 and then put a replacement in core for 8.3. I guess we could signal our intentions in the release notes. It's a pity we didn't have Abhijit's patch 6 weeks ago. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: