Re: autoconf version for back branches?
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: autoconf version for back branches? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 44FB881E.2050004@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: autoconf version for back branches? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: autoconf version for back branches?
Re: autoconf version for back branches? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > >> I see that older back branches are still using version 2.53 of autoconf, >> rather than the 2.59 branch we have updated to for 8.1 and beyond. Does >> that mean I need to install version 2.53 if I want to update the config >> on those branches? >> > > Yup. We aren't changing back autoconf versions if we can help it --- > too much risk of breakage. > > >> If so, fixing the plpython problem I reported >> recently seems like too much work. >> > > It's not a big problem if you install 'em into private subdirectories, > eg I have autoconf-2.53 installed with --prefix = /usr/local/autoconf-2.53 > and do > PATH=/usr/local/autoconf-2.53/bin:$PATH autoconf > when I need to update back-branch configure scripts. > > > Ah! Thanks! What had failed for me was just running with /path/to/old/autoconf - this one works however. Strange that a config package can't work out where its own installed files are. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: