Re: @ versus ~, redux
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: @ versus ~, redux |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 44FB1580.5040001@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | @ versus ~, redux (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: @ versus ~, redux
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> I can see various things that we might consider doing: > > 1. Just flip the names of the two operators added by the GIN patch. > > 2. #1 plus flip the names of the various contrib operators that are > out of sync (Michael Fuhr points out that contrib/intarray is out > of step too ... are there others?). > > 3. Leave the existing op names as-is in core and contrib, but consider > them deprecated and add new ops with consistently-chosen names. > (The new ops introduced by GIN should only exist with the new names.) > > #1 isn't doing anything towards solving the underlying problem. > #2 has got obvious backwards-compatibility issues for contrib users. +1 on #2 with the following caveat. When we publish the release notes, we have a specific section that says: Compatibility changes from previous releases. Which IMHO should be there anyway as there are always compatibility issues from release to release. Joshua D. Drake -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutionssince 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: