Re: database contest results
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: database contest results |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 44F4B5BE.7030302@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: database contest results (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Jeff Davis wrote: > On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 19:20 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> Jeff Davis wrote: >>> Clearly, there is a huge difference in the overall application. The >>> PostgreSQL entry was done quickly, and the author probably didn't >>> understand the terms of the contest entirely, let alone have the time >>> to optimize his entry. >> I don't think you should make these kinds of insulting judgements >> without research. >> > > The author himself said he didn't have time. I didn't mean to be > insulting, and I apologize if I was. 120 versus 3000 seems like the > MySQL entry guys were operating with an entirely separate set of > assumptions, and spent much more time optimizing it and determining the > exact contest requirements. I didn't find it insulting. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > > Regards, > Jeff Davis > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly > -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: