Re: Replication Documentation
| От | Markus Schiltknecht |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Replication Documentation |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 44F2B242.60807@bluegap.ch обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Replication Documentation (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Replication Documentation
|
| Список | pgsql-docs |
Robert Treat wrote: > On Monday 21 August 2006 09:47, Markus Schiltknecht wrote: >> has there been a consensus about where a replication document should go >> and what it should cover? > > I think the general idea is to toss it on techdocs... like the GUI Tools > page... http://www.postgresql.org/docs/techdocs.54 Hm. I didn't know that one. There is already a section about replication. Chris, do you agree to put your article there? But AFAIK the goal of our discussion was to put _something_ into the official documentation to make it better visible. Lots of people ask for replication solutions, but up to now there is no official statement. So newcomers need to google around, figure out about lots of different projects, partly dead ones, etc... If we put an extensive replication article in the techdocs, we need to link it somehow from the main documentatino, IMHO. Otherwise it probably won't help that much. Regards Markus
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: