Re: [Pgsqlrpms-hackers] Safer auto-initdb for RPM init
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [Pgsqlrpms-hackers] Safer auto-initdb for RPM init |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 44F0DD59.1020203@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [Pgsqlrpms-hackers] Safer auto-initdb for RPM init ("Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew@zeut.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [Pgsqlrpms-hackers] Safer auto-initdb for RPM init
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Matthew T. O'Connor wrote: > Jim C. Nasby wrote: >> On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 01:32:17PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: >>> I am not exactly sure why we initdb at all. IMHO it would be better >>> if the start script just checked if there was a cluster. If not, it >>> wouldn't start, it would error with: You do not have a cluster, >>> please read man page on initdb. >> >> As Tom mentioned, it's for newbie-friendliness. While I can understand >> that, I think it needs to be easy to shut that off. > > I understand that, but it seems the whole problem of people overwriting > there data dir is because we initdb from the start script. If we > installed the datadir during the RPM install, it would still be newbie > friendly and would removed initdb from start script solving that problem. initdb will not overwrite an existing installation. Joshua D. Drake > > The only downside is larger disk foot-print for something that a user > may never use. Given the size of todays hard drives, and the size of a > standard RedHat install, I don't think that is much of an issue. > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend > -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutionssince 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: