Re: Replication
От | Markus Schiltknecht |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Replication |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 44E9D4DE.8070905@bluegap.ch обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Replication (AgentM <agentm@themactionfaction.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, AgentM wrote: > I would imagine that multi-master synchronous replication would be > fairly trivial to implement with 2PC and wal-shipping available, no? Yes, that could be done. And AFAIK eigter pgpool or PgCluster (1) try to do sync, multi-master replication that way. The problem is that such an implementation is very network intensive and scales very badly for writing transactions. If you're interested in a good sync, multi-master replication algorithm, you might want to have a look at what Slony-II [1] or Postgres-R [2] try to do. I also recommend reading "Don't be lazy, be consistent" of Bettina Kemme [3]. Regards Markus [1]: http://www.slony2.org/wiki/index.php?title=Documentation [2]: http://www.postgres-r.org/ [3]: http://www.cs.mcgill.ca/~kemme/papers/vldb00.html
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: