Re: pg_dump schema breakup
От | Naz Gassiep |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dump schema breakup |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 44E5F2A2.2020709@mira.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_dump schema breakup (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
<br /> Tom Lane wrote: <blockquote cite="mid21511.1155919931@sss.pgh.pa.us" type="cite"><pre wrap="">Naz Gassiep <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"href="mailto:naz@mira.net"><naz@mira.net></a> writes: </pre><blockquote type="cite"><prewrap="">I propose that two more be added: --tables-only --constraints-only </pre></blockquote><pre wrap=""> This doesn't seem well-defined at all. There are many objects in a database that are definitely neither tables nor constraints, and it's not very clear what things should be considered constraints either. I think what you may really be after is "the stuff that should be loaded before inserting data" and "the stuff that should be loaded after", but the above are poor names for these concepts. regards, tom lane</pre></blockquote> And here I was thinking that I'd been clear :)<br /><br /> But yes, you areright, what I want is "the stuff that gets loaded before data insertion" and "the stuff that goes after data insertion"<br/><br /> Essentially, the CREATE TABLE statements are the first part as that is what is needed for data to beinserted. Everything else is the second part.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: