Re: [PATCHES] Custom variable class segmentation fault
От | Zdenek Kotala |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCHES] Custom variable class segmentation fault |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 44E1D32D.4010200@sun.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCHES] Custom variable class segmentation fault (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCHES] Custom variable class segmentation fault
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce, Andrew, Tom. I little bit confuse now, what status of this patch is? I check your observation and I agree with them. But I don't where is "ball" now and what I can/must do now like author of this patch? Thanks for explanation Zdenek Bruce Momjian napsal(a): > OK, with two people now concerned, patch reverted. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> >> Tom Lane wrote: >>> I've always found it easier to review uncommitted patches than committed >>> ones anyway. When you're playing catch-up by reviewing a committed >>> patch, you have to deal with three states of the code rather than two >>> (pre-patch, post-patch, your own mods). That gets rapidly worse if the >>> patch has been in there awhile and other changes go in on top of it. >>> Plus, once other changes accumulate on top, it becomes extremely painful >>> to revert if the conclusion is that the patch is completely broken. >>> (A conclusion that I don't think is at all unlikely with respect to >>> this patch.) >>> >>> >>> >> Easy or not this strikes me as good policy. And nothing is urgent quite >> yet - we still have another 18 days to the end of the month, which is >> the stated deadline for getting patches reviewed and committed. >> >> cheers >> >> andrew >> >> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: