Re: Buildfarm failure on ecpg/test/pgtypeslib
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Buildfarm failure on ecpg/test/pgtypeslib |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 44DA4DEA.6040200@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Buildfarm failure on ecpg/test/pgtypeslib ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Jim C. Nasby wrote: > On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 12:17:44PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > >> Jim C. Nasby wrote: >> >>> Platypus just started failing... >>> http://pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=platypus&dt=2006-08-09%2010:05:01 >>> >>> Rest of the farm is looking pretty green, though, so I'm not sure what >>> to make of it... but >>> http://pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=platypus&dt=2006-08-09%2009:05:01 >>> is the first run it failed on, and several files changed in ecpg/test: >>> >>> Files changed this run >>> >>> pgsql/src/interfaces/ecpg/ChangeLog 1.320 >>> pgsql/src/interfaces/ecpg/include/pgtypes_numeric.h 1.16 >>> pgsql/src/interfaces/ecpg/test/expected/pgtypeslib-num_test2.c 1.2 >>> pgsql/src/interfaces/ecpg/test/expected/pgtypeslib-num_test2.stdout 1.2 >>> pgsql/src/interfaces/ecpg/test/pgtypeslib/num_test2.pgc 1.2 >>> pgsql/src/interfaces/ecpg/pgtypeslib/numeric.c 1.29 >>> >>> Also, it looks like "Files changed since last sucess" maybe isn't >>> working right? Or does it intentionally exclude files already listed in >>> "changed since last run"? >>> >>> >> Jim, can you upgrade your version of the script to the latest in CVS? >> >> http://cvs.pgfoundry.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/pgbuildfarm/client-code/run_build.pl?rev=1.64&content-type=text/plain >> >> It has a feature that blows away the ccache directory on failure, so >> that we don't have a failure that might be caused by ccache persisting. >> > > Doesn't seem to be working; the cache still had data after > http://pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=platypus&dt=2006-08-09%2019:59:17. > *ahem* you loaded 1.62 (the latest release), not 1.64 (cvs tip) like I asked. > >> After that, remove the actual cache.( I notice that you are using ccache >> but don't seem to have a cache directory set - that can be a problem, >> too. It's best to have a cache per branch) >> > > That seems kinda bunk, since ccache is normally used in a system-wide > setting. > Not on my boxes! ;-) ccache is only used if explicitly invoked in my world. >> Alternatively, just turn off use of ccache in your config file - >> probably commenting out this line would suffice: >> >> 'CC' => 'ccache gcc -O3 -pipe' >> >> >> And see if that fixes the problem. >> > > Nope, no dice... > At any rate, do please try to blow the cache away manually and rerun. btw, your config file also looks slightly out of date - a modern one will set up a per branch cache, which is both safer and more effective. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: