Re: 8.2 features status
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 8.2 features status |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 44D40030.7010508@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 8.2 features status (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: 8.2 features status
Re: 8.2 features status Re: 8.2 features status |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> I tend to agree --- I don't see much value in trying to institute a > formalized process. We have not had that many cases where lack of > communication was a problem. How do you know? Seriously... this comes up at least twice a year :). There is probably a basis for it. As I was saying on #postgresql, the current system works well for a small group of developers. I don't think there is any arguing that. However, there is a larger group out there, that would likely be willing to contribute but we are a bit of a black box, or perhaps we are too transparent?? I am not sure which. Frankly, I don't care if we ever get a bug tracker or use trac. However a more formalized communication process is sorely needed IMHO. I am actually hoping that jabber.postgresql.org would help that in the long run. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutionssince 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: