Re: LISTEN considered dangerous
От | Flemming Frandsen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: LISTEN considered dangerous |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 44D03EE3.8010406@partyticket.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: LISTEN considered dangerous ("Ian Harding" <harding.ian@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: LISTEN considered dangerous
Re: LISTEN considered dangerous |
Список | pgsql-general |
Ian Harding wrote: > NOTIFY interacts with SQL transactions in some important ways. > Firstly, if a NOTIFY is executed inside a transaction, the notify > events are not delivered until and unless the transaction is > committed. This is appropriate, since if the transaction is aborted, > all the commands within it have had no effect, including NOTIFY. But > it can be disconcerting if one is expecting the notification events to > be delivered immediately. Yes, that's very nice, but it doesn't have *anything* to do with what I posted about. I'm bothered by listen listening from the end of the transaction in stead of the start of the transaction. -- Regards Flemming Frandsen - http://dion.swamp.dk - YAPH
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: