Re: Best Procedural Language?
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Best Procedural Language? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 44D03287.5030404@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Best Procedural Language? ("Carlo Stonebanks" <stonec.register@sympatico.ca>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Carlo Stonebanks wrote: > Well, the surprise for me is: this is exactly what I thought! I actually do > have a lot of string manipulation to do, but I am the only one on the team > with Tcl experience. For the sake of other developers I thought that the > plPHP project would be interesting, but I don't get the impression that it > is as well-developed as plTcl. Does anyone know anything about it? plPHP is not as mature as plTcl (or is that plTclng). However it is very well developed and maintained. Heck, companies are even holding talks and training classes on it now. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: