Re: Mail archive indexes are broken, URLs too

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>> Is anyone working on this?  Marc?  If not, who can make these
>>> modifications to the archive numbering?
>> I believe Marc is the only one that can at last I heard on this, he
>> disagreed with rolling back the change.
>
> I have heard no reason he doesn't like the change, and unless he can
> convince most of us, it is time to make the change.
>

Marc wrote:


Nope, for one simple reason ... if, for some reason, at some point in
the future, we have to regenerate everything anyway (ie. the last time
we did a major template change for the archives), all the #'ng is going
to end up reverting back to what it is now ... so we'd only be 'delaying
the inevitable' ...

On July 17th.

Joshua D. Drake

--

    === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
    Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
              http://www.commandprompt.com/