Re: [PATCHES] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: /contrib/cube improvements:
От | Joshua Reich |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCHES] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: /contrib/cube improvements: |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 44C91A6B.7040903@root.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCHES] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: /contrib/cube improvements: (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I am uncomfortable with the fact that the ordering is different on different architectures. AFAIK, all I did was port the ordering function from V0 to V1. Short of me continually submitting patches until I fix it, is there an easier way, or some pointers as to what I should be looking for in the code? The function in question, I believe, is cube_cmp_v0(). Josh Andrew Dunstan wrote: > I wrote: > >> >> I have applied this and made an attempt to fix >> cube/expected/cube_1.out - we will still need to keep an eye on the >> various cube tests. >> > > It looks like with the current tests we will need at least one more > possible results file (gazelle and asp on buildfarm agree about negative > zero but disagree about ordering, so we would need to handle both > variants which were previously handed in just cube_1.out). That would > make four for this little module. Is it just me or does that seem > excessive? Can we possibly simplify things a bit? > > cheers > > andrew -- Joshua Reich Finance and Corporate Development ROOT Exchange, A Division of ROOT Markets 601 W. 26th St. / Suite 1500 New York, NY 10001 W - (212) 645 6320 x 7101 M / T - (646) 427 7959 E - josh@rootexchange.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: