Re: Time to scale up?
От | Paul Ramsey |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Time to scale up? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 44C6B03D.70402@refractions.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Time to scale up? ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Time to scale up?
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Marc G. Fournier wrote: > Actually, using the 'kernel vs add ons' metaphor, it would make more > sense to make a series of smaller 'distributions', tailored to specific > markets ... ie. a Java distribution that includes JDBC+PL/Java, but > doesn't include the other PLs ... or a Ruby package that includes the > Ruby interface and pl/ruby ... or a ... etc ... > > Not one distribution for all tastes, but individual distributions > tailored to specific groups / programmers ... Spoken like a true programmer. :) I have been amazed by the power of the simple optimization rule "remove barriers to entry", and how it has worked. The Windows port of PgSQL and associated installer (itself a "distribution" in the kernel-metaphor sense, only carried on the main PostgreSQL site) has had a huge affect on PostGIS usage, so I assume the same holds true for PgSQL in general. But such an approach (one size fits all, click the big green button for download) is basically the diametric opposite of what you suggest. P
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: