Re: Time to scale up?
От | Paul Ramsey |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Time to scale up? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 44C6AB82.60100@refractions.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Time to scale up? ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Time to scale up?
Re: Time to scale up? Re: Time to scale up? |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Yes, that's what I mean, only at www.postgresql.org and with integrated documentation as well as packaging. The "PostgreSQL is a kernel" metaphor breaks down pretty fast, given that PostgreSQL sans add-ons is quite useful, to the extent that (as many many people have previously written) the fact that add-ons even *exist* is news to lots of PostgreSQL users. This is not a misconception someone trying to use "Linux" (just the kernel) would ever run into. I think any honest assessment of the "software evaluation experience" around PostgreSQL would have to admit that (a) people start at the main PostgreSQL web site and (b) the existence and overall utility of the various add-ons are pretty well hidden and (c) if they were less well hidden people might have a better initial impression of the available capabilities of the overall product. Pointing out that your site over there does a better job of it does not make the main site any less unhelpful. P Joshua D. Drake wrote: > >> If we want PostgreSQL to "look bigger" from the outside, it is not >> necessary to actually *make* it bigger, "looking" bigger is sufficient. >> >> Imagine a download page that included: >> >> postgresql-database-8.1.4 >> postgresql-replication-1.0.2 >> postgresql-gis-1.1.3 >> postgresql-pooling-1.0.3 > > You mean like www.mammothpostgresql.org? > > As mentioned previously. PostgreSQL is similar to a kernel. It is not a > distribution. > > > > Joshua D. Drake >
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: