Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features?
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 44BCF1D4.3010807@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features? (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chris.kings-lynne@calorieking.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features?
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: >> The major downside is that somewhere between 9000 and 10000 >> VALUES-targetlists produces "ERROR: stack depth limit exceeded". >> Perhaps for the typical use-case this is sufficient though. >> >> I'm open to better ideas, comments, objections... > > > If the use case is people running MySQL dumps, then there will be > millions of values-targetlists in MySQL dumps. > > Yeah. The fabricated select hack does feel wrong to me. Taking a quick 2 minute look at the grammar it looks like a better bet would be to make InsertStmt.targetList a list of lists of values rather than just a list of values. Of course, that would make the changes more invasive. Even with that we'd still be reading the whole thing into memory ... is there a sane way to cache the inline data before statement execution? I guess we can just say that for true bulk load our supported mechanism is still just COPY, but it would be a pity to restrict a feature that is in the standard that way. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: