Re: permission to create user
От | Timothy Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: permission to create user |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 44BCE606.8010702@open-networks.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: permission to create user (Rafal Pietrak <rafal@zorro.isa-geek.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Rafal Pietrak wrote: > On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 07:54 -0400, John DeSoi wrote: > >> On Jul 17, 2006, at 2:56 AM, Timothy Smith wrote: >> >> >>> is it possible to give a non super user the ability to create >>> another user of a different group? >>> i'm looking for a way to assign a special group of admin's just >>> enough rights to create other lowbie users without letting them >>> bypass all other access restrictions. >>> >> You could create a function with the SECURITY DEFINER option which >> allows the function to be executed with the privileges of the user >> that created it. >> > > I've been trying to do that same thing, and it works even without the > function. Still, it works with a 'glitch' but the reason for that > 'glitch' is not quite clear to me. When I have: > CREATE GROUP masters; > ALTER ROLE masters CREATEUSER; > CREATE USER user_one IN GROUP MASTERS; > CREATE TABLE test1 (stamp timestamp, thing text); > REVOKE ALL ON test1 FROM PUBLIC; > GRANT INSERT ON test1 TO MASTERS; > > Then, then I do: > system_prompt$ psql -U user_one mydb > mydb> INSERT INTO test1 (stamp) VALUES (current_timestamp); > -- this works OK!! > mydb> CREATE USER user_two; > -- this fails unless I do: > mydb> SET ROLE masters; > mydb> CREATE USER user_two; > -- this works OK, "user_two" gets created. > > Any one knows, why do I have to explicitly SET ROLE, when I try to > exercise the group priviledge of role creation, while I don't need that > when accessing tables? Is this a feature, or a bug? > > I got it to work for me using the previous advice of setting CREATEROLE for the group of users i wanted to have permission to do so.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: