Re: Windows buildfarm support, or lack of it
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Windows buildfarm support, or lack of it |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 44BA7378.9070800@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Windows buildfarm support, or lack of it ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: Windows buildfarm support, or lack of it
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Dave Page wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org on behalf of Tom Lane > Sent: Sun 7/16/2006 3:29 PM > To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org > Subject: [HACKERS] Windows buildfarm support, or lack of it > > >> AFAICT, snake is the only Windows machine that >> actually runs the buildfarm on a regular schedule, and even it is just >> running once a day. >> > > I can bump that up as high as you'd like within reason. 4? 6 times a day? > > Let's go for 6, at least for HEAD. Under normal use buildfarm doesn't actually do anything unless it detects a change in the source, and it makes sure there isn't a collision by using a lockfile. That means it is safe to schedule builds fairly frequently. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: