Re: contrib promotion?
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: contrib promotion? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 44B7C717.2070009@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: contrib promotion? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: contrib promotion?
Re: contrib promotion? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: >> There has been action to clean up and remove some contrib modules, and >> this is good. I would like to suggest that we should try to move one or >> two the other way, namely right into the core proper, on the ground that >> they have widespread applicability and should have maximum visibility. >> I'm talking particularly about pgcrypto and tsearch2, and the main thing >> lacking that I see with these is documentation. > > I don't see a strong need for moving pgcrypto into core, and there's at > least one argument against it: if someone needs a crypto-free version of > postgres for use someplace with benighted laws, they would be screwed. Doesn't our inclusion of md5() pretty much blow that argument away? (Just asking). Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutionssince 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: