Re: Three weeks left until feature freeze
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Three weeks left until feature freeze |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 44B67DBE.3090805@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Three weeks left until feature freeze (Csaba Nagy <nagy@ecircle-ag.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Three weeks left until feature freeze
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Csaba Nagy wrote: > On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 15:29, Stephen Frost wrote: >> It's not the PostgreSQL project's problem, that's true, but it certainly >> becomes an issue for distributions. Java as a PL ends up being a pretty >> odd case.. If there isn't anything in the PL code itself which forces a >> dependency beyond gcj then it might be possible to distribute it. Also >> allowing the PL to use a different JVM shouldn't be a problem so long as >> nothing is distributed which depends on the alternate JVM. The GPL is >> all about distribution and so I'm not sure that it would actually be a >> problem for an end-user to use Sun's JVM with GPL'd Java code. > > Now I'm completely confused... what GPL code ? Is PL/Java licensed under > the GPL ? Or what GPL code do you talk about ? What was a mistake on my part. I was tired when I wrote the part about GPL. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > > The PL/Java code is likely only dependent on the JVM specification, > which does not put any restriction on how you must license your code, so > PL/Java can be licensed in any way the author wants, including BSD. > > The distribution part is also no problem as I see it, as only the build > tools are not BSD, and they are available for free (including the Sun > JDK) and they don't restrict what should be the license of the code you > compile. This can only be a problem for purists like GPL zealots or > perhaps debian, otherwise is not that hard to download and install the > SUN JDK on a build machine... you don't need to distribute the JDK, only > the runtime JVM, which you actually can do (including again the Sun > runtime). So I can't see problems again from the packager point of > view... except purists might put a separate pl/Java module in some > "non-free" repository given the dependency on some "non-free" runtime... > > Cheers, > Csaba. > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly > -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutionssince 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: