Re: WAL Internals question
От | Fabrice Franquenk |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WAL Internals question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 44AB8693.10700@bull.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WAL Internals question (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-novice |
Tom Lane a écrit : > Fabrice Franquenk <Fabrice.Franquenk@bull.net> writes: > >> Now i tried to set the bgwriter_lru_percent to 100% and >> bgwriter_lru_maxpages to 1000 and >> i did not spot any difference with the disk activities, cpu occupation >> or anything else from >> > > Hmm, are you sure your changes took effect? To get the bgwriter's > attention you need to make the change in postgresql.conf and then > SIGHUP or restart the postmaster. I'd have thought you could easily > measure a difference given that much change ... > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend > > I made sure that all changes in postgresql.conf took effect. I restarted the postmaster and i could not spot any difference. The values of bgwriter_all_percent and bgwriter_all_maxpages are all default (and i set checkpoints segments value to 250). Could there be some kind of connection between these parameters and the bgwriter_lru_* parameters? by the way, was i correct describing the transaction handling mechanism ? thanks for your help regards, Fabrice Franquenk
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: