Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Do a pass of code review for the

Alvaro Herrera wrote:

>>Thanks, that is what was needed.  The author obviously took the patch as
>>far as he could, and we needed to adjust his XXX areas, rather than not
>>apply the patch and have the code drifting.
>>    
>>
>
>Hmm, is this how we should do things?  I mean, should I finish the
>autovacuum parts of my relminxid patch, apply it, and then hope for
>someone to fix the mistaeks?  And if we don't see any failure in the
>buildfarm, assume that all is well?
>
>To me this is really the easiest way, but I have a hard time convincing
>myself that I want to have it easy but break things in a way that nobody
>notices.  The other day when I typoed a commit to the 8.1 branch I was
>all red in the face.  I wonder what will happen if someone points to me
>or Greg as causing major breakage somewhere, just because the patch was
>applied in a hurry without careful review.
>
>  
>

I am guilty of a similar recent sin that Tom caught. But, like you, I am 
opposed to lessening the stability in the code base, which is something 
we should be proud of and guard carefully.

cheers

andrew