Re: Some performance numbers, with thoughts
От | Ron Mayer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Some performance numbers, with thoughts |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 44A2A335.50601@cheapcomplexdevices.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Some performance numbers, with thoughts (Brian Hurt <bhurt@janestcapital.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Combining the "insert" statements in a big concatenated string joined by semicolons - rather than sending each individually can drastically speed up your inserts; making them much closer to the speed of copy. For example, instead of sending them separately, it's much faster to send a single string like this "insert into tbl (c1,c2) values (v1,v2);insert into tbl (c1,c2) values (v3,v4);..." presumably due to the round-trip packets sending each insert takes. Brian Hurt wrote: > > Inserts, 1,000 per transaction ~5,400 inserts/second > Copy, 1,000 element blocks ~20,000 inserts/second > When I last measured it it was about a factor of 4 speedup (3 seconds vs 0.7 seconds) by concatenating the inserts with sample code shown her [1]. If the same ratio holds for your test case, these concatenated inserts would be almost the exact same speed as a copy. Ron M [1] http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2005-09/msg00327.php
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: