Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jan Wieck
Тема Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
Дата
Msg-id 449F6DE9.4070101@Yahoo.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Ответы Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>)
Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 6/25/2006 10:12 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> When you are using the update chaining, you can't mark that index row as
> dead because it actually points to more than one row on the page, some
> are non-visible, some are visible.

Back up the truck ... you mean in the current code base we have heap 
tuples that are visible in index scans because of heap tuple chaining 
but without index tuples pointing directly at them?


Jan

-- 
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
Следующее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC