Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
От | Jan Wieck |
---|---|
Тема | Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 449F6DE9.4070101@Yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 6/25/2006 10:12 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > When you are using the update chaining, you can't mark that index row as > dead because it actually points to more than one row on the page, some > are non-visible, some are visible. Back up the truck ... you mean in the current code base we have heap tuples that are visible in index scans because of heap tuple chaining but without index tuples pointing directly at them? Jan -- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: