Re: Slightly bogus regression test for contrib/dblink
От | Joe Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Slightly bogus regression test for contrib/dblink |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 44983D87.4000703@joeconway.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Slightly bogus regression test for contrib/dblink (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Slightly bogus regression test for contrib/dblink
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes: > >>I haven't really looked at the buildfarm before -- I might be blind, but >>I couldn't figure out how to see the regression.diff file. > > It's on the cited page, if you scroll down far enough. OK, I'm officially blind (so much for that lasik work I had done ;-)), I had scrolled right on past the diff the first time. > It looks to me like the diffs are consistent with the idea that the> test is using a copy of dblink that predates thispatch ... do you> agree? If so, anyone have an idea how that could happen? I thought> we'd fixed all the rpath problems,and anyway osprey wasn't failing> like this before today. I would think that the diffs would be significantly larger if that were the case. In fact, when was PG_MODULE_MAGIC first made mandatory? Joe
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: