Re: statement caching proof of concept
От | Oliver Jowett |
---|---|
Тема | Re: statement caching proof of concept |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4497C73F.7040804@opencloud.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: statement caching proof of concept (Oliver Jowett <oliver@opencloud.com>) |
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Oliver Jowett wrote: > Dave Cramer wrote: >> >> On 19-Jun-06, at 7:15 PM, Oliver Jowett wrote: >>> >>> The "wrapper" implementation approach suffers from the usual >>> difficulty that the "back links" such as ResultSet.getStatement() >>> point to the wrong object. It's actually quite a bit of work to get >>> this right.. >> Since result sets only live as long as the statement, wouldn't they >> point to the statement that is still open ? > > What I mean is that this won't work: > > PreparedStatement ps = conn.prepareStatement(...); > ResultSet rs = ps.executeQuery(); > assert rs.getStatement() == ps; > > since rs.getStatement() will return the real underlying statement, not > the wrapper that prepareStatement() creates. Oh, never mind, I didn't look at the code closely enough, you're returning the real statement not a wrapper. (that has some other problems with badly-behaved code as others have noted) -O
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: