Re: postgres vs. oracle for very large tables
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: postgres vs. oracle for very large tables |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 448F6FA1.7060106@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: postgres vs. oracle for very large tables ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Jim C. Nasby wrote: > On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 12:24:51PM -0700, TJ O'Donnell wrote: >> I've written some extensions to postgres to implement >> chemical structure searching. I get inquiries about >> the performance of postgres vs. oracle. This is a huge >> topic, with lots of opinions and lots of facts. But, >> today I got some feedback stating the opinion that: >> "Postgres performance diminishes with large tables >> (we?ll be going to upwards of hundreds of millions of rows)." It really depends. I have many customers with hundred of millions of rows that don't have ANY problems. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: