Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards?
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 448E11B1.20309@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? (Steve Atkins <steve@blighty.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards?
Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? |
Список | pgsql-performance |
> Empirically... postgresql built for 64 bits is marginally slower than > that built > for a 32 bit api on sparc. None of my customers have found 64 bit x86 > systems to be suitable for production use, yet, so I've not tested on any > of those architectures. Really? All of our customers are migrating to Opteron and I have many that have been using Opteron for over 12 months happily. Joshua D. Drake > > Cheers, > Steve > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq > -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: