Re: TODO: Add pg_get_acldef(), pg_get_typedefault(), pg_get_attrdef(),
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: TODO: Add pg_get_acldef(), pg_get_typedefault(), pg_get_attrdef(), |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 448B8BEF.2060307@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: TODO: Add pg_get_acldef(), pg_get_typedefault(), pg_get_attrdef(), ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: TODO: Add pg_get_acldef(), pg_get_typedefault(), pg_get_attrdef(),
Re: TODO: Add pg_get_acldef(), pg_get_typedefault(), pg_get_attrdef(), |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > Well, the argument against changing pg_dump is that it would impact the > ability to use the newer version of pg_dump with older backends (which > would be lacking these functions). > > ISTM what would be best is to add the functions to the backend, and add > a TODO or comments to pg_dump indicating that it should be changed to > use these functions once 8.1 is no longer supported. Or you could make > pg_dump's use of this code dependent on the server version it connected > to. Off list I was speaking with AndrewD and he said that he would expect that if we called pg_get_tabledef() it should return the CREATE statement for the table. With all due respect to Andrew, why? At least in my mind these functions really belong to app developers.. e.g; CREATE TABLE foo (id serial); SELECT pg_get_tabledef(foo) would return id, serial Not: CREATE TABLE foo (id serial); I mean, I can do either but I would like to get a clear definition of what we are looking for here. Maybe: pg_get_tabledef is the actual SQL and pg_get_tabledesc() is the column, datatype output? I guess I don't see the advantage of putting pg_dump -s -t in the backend. Joshua D. Drake -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: