Re: Not sure how useful this is ... but ...
От | Thomas Hallgren |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Not sure how useful this is ... but ... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 44812943.2050401@tada.se обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Not sure how useful this is ... but ... (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Reading that the trends are "based upon just a portion of our searches" makes me believe that the trend is based on sampling, and thus relative to the number of Google searches overall (and thus *not* relative to its own history). That would explain a lot. There has been a vast increase in Google overall usage over the last couple of years. Another reason might be that the more common a term gets, the more pointless it becomes to use it verbatim in a search. Using it phrases is a different matter of course but I doubt the reflects fragments of phrases. Google Labs admit that the product is "in the early stages of development". They probably have a long way to go before the "trend" becomes meaningful to look at. In my opinion, the "News Reference Volume" diagram is far more interesting the "Search Volume". That diagram should be the major one. My conclusion. This is not useful at all. Not yet. Regards, Thomas Hallgren
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: