Re: Best high availability solution ?
| От | Arnaud Lesauvage |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Best high availability solution ? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 448057E4.9070309@freesurf.fr обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Best high availability solution ? (Scott Ribe <scott_ribe@killerbytes.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
Scott Ribe a écrit : > I prefer the approach of keeping the backup server up to date, whether using > PITR or Slony or your own home-grown synching, and then changing IPs. My > process involves someone making the decision that server is indeed down, > then UNPLUGGING it from the network, then changing the IP of the backup. > Actually bringing the backup online involves a bit more than changing the > IP, because PG is not the only service running on it, but there's a simple > script for the user to run. > > Of course this requires that the backup be on the same subnet as the server, > a restriction which is not shared by the alternate app/DSN nor the DNS > techniques... I am going towards this solution. Quite hard to test the backup script in real situation, but I believe this is the way to go. -- Arnaud
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: