Re: Best high availability solution ?
От | Arnaud Lesauvage |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Best high availability solution ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 447D6F91.706@freesurf.fr обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Best high availability solution ? ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: Best high availability solution ?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Dave Page a écrit : > Slony-I only exists for Windows in a not-even-beta state at the moment, > so even if you get things up and running using a virtual IP solution you > will be hand-holding Slony until it gets properly released. OK, I thought it was in production stage. > If I'm honest, I think your boss is going to be disappointed. You would > add a *lot* of complexity to the system to make it handle failures with > zero intervention, and that extra complexity is probably more likely to > go wrong than a single server. I'd spend your time and money on making > sure your raid & ups are good, that you are running on server grade > hardware with ECC RAM, and that you have good out of band management > facilities so even if you are away from the office you can connect via > VPN/modem or whatever and fix things. I think you're right. Is there a simple replication solution for windows then ? Or will I have to stop the master postgresql at night to pgdump and pgrestore on the backup server ? If I have a synchronized backup server (even if it synchronizes once or twice a day, this might be OK), I could just write a simple script that would change the host file of the clients to have the postgresql's name to point to the backup IP... -- Arnaud
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: