Re: ALTER SEQUENCE
От | Don Y |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ALTER SEQUENCE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 446D5AE0.7020308@DakotaCom.Net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ALTER SEQUENCE ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: ALTER SEQUENCE
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Jim C. Nasby wrote: > On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 03:00:48PM -0700, Don Y wrote: >>> I see the documentation mention added August 1, 2005 byt Tom Lane. >> Date tag on the bottom of my man pages is "2005-01-17" -- so that >> explains *that*! :> > > This is a very minor reason why you should be running the most recent > 8.0.x release and not 8.0.3. A much bigger reason is that there are > data-loss bugs that have been fixed. <grin> You're always faced with the decision of which set of bugs/features to stick with during development. If we upgrade every time there is a new release, we spend lots of time doing upgrades instead of developing! :-( The folks watching the Postgres releases haven't yet said we need to "step forward". The only problem *I* have found has been documentation related (above) so not an inconvenience. I don't believe any other folks have experienced major lossage (here) under 8.0.3. So, it hasn't been expensive to stick with a non-current release. (hopefully it will stay that way for us for a while longer, yet...)
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: